|
Question: |
Did you have a choice between taking Imuran or Cellcept, if yes why did you choose Cellcept ? |
|
Name |
Answers |
|
Aneta |
TRIED IMURAN WITH NO RESULTS AND TO MANY SIDE EFFECTS ( INFECTIONS). |
|
Bob |
Cellcept had fewer advertised side effects than other medications. My choice to not go more aggressive. |
|
Bill |
Wasn’t given a choice. |
|
Jackson |
imuran is not an option. |
|
Brenda |
less side effects, newer med. |
|
Buddy |
Yes, Imuron was not as effective anymore. |
|
Carmen |
Imuran was never offered or discussed. |
|
Cathy |
Neuro started me on Imuran first and I had a terrible reaction to it, so was changed to Cellcept. |
|
Christine |
I did have a choice, I chose Cellcept, It has less side affects. |
|
Dean |
No. |
|
Debbie |
Imuran has worked before, but didn't seem to be during this exacerbation. |
|
hack |
My neuro did not want me on Imuran because of the known side effects. |
|
Woody |
I was on imuran and was dissatisfied with my progress against my MG symptoms, so I switched to cellcept, also based upon reports that Johns Hopkins was having good results with cellcept. |
|
Jeff |
I had used Imuran and it was very bad with side effects (severe upper and lower lower GI tract problems) |
|
Jennifer |
I guess I had a choice but the neuro and I went straight with the CellCept since it's the "new" drug of choice. |
|
Joanne |
The Imuran was working great since 1996. I prefer the Imuran because of the dosing with CellCept. the 1 hr. before meals and 3 hrs after… |
|
John |
No. |
|
Kerri |
Neuro suggested it, he did not want to give me Imuran. Said the side effects of CellCept were less. |
|
Kevin |
I tried Imuran for more than a year but symptoms did not improve. |
|
Linda W. |
I tried Imuran in Sept. 2002. After one month, my liver enzymes went up 10 times normal, and I had a bad rash. My neuro said I was lucky I didn't slough off the skin on my hands. |
|
Louise |
Imuran was never really a choice for me as my liver enzymes went sky high after a short time on imuran. |
|
Marianne |
Yes. Cellcept seemed to have fewer side effects and sounded more promising for MG. |
|
Michael A. |
Yes - Cellcept has fewer bad side effects. |
|
Michael R. |
Imuran was never considered; it has its own set of troublesome side effects |
|
Rebecca |
I had already had elevated liver function with Imuran. |
|
Renee |
No choice given. |
|
Robert |
Neuro felt was abetter choice for me. |
|
Blutomato |
Switched from Immuran. |
|
Jim |
No, immuran hadn't worked for me. |
|
Jan |
Had to stop taking Imuran after many years due to low white blood count, so Cellcept was obvious next step. |
|
Connie |
Tried Imuran and it wasn't helping after approx 8 months of use. |
|
Diane G. |
See my answers to questions # 1-3 |
|
Diane M. |
No, Imuran, didn't seem to be helping, as much, especially with my diaphram. To avoid Prednisone, we started Cellcept. |
Page
designed by Terry Riley
http://myasthenia.puhs.org/
Friday, January 31, 2003